ArticleClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2026
Effect of Supplemental Condition-Specific Video Education on Patient Understanding in Vitreoretinal Surgery.
Article in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: In-person patient education is central to surgical counseling and informed consent. However, with verbal discussion alone, there may be limited understanding of complex vitreoretinal procedures. This study evaluated whether supplemental condition-specific Vidscrip video education improves patient-reported understanding among individuals undergoing vitreoretinal surgery. Methods: This comparative study enrolled 40 English-speaking patients undergoing vitreoretinal procedures at an academic ophthalmology center between January 1 Results: Twenty patients were assigned to the Vidscrip group and twenty to standard counseling. Mean patient-reported understanding scores were high in both groups, with no significant differences for eye condition (9.25 vs 9.50, P=0.636), treatment options (8.35 vs 9.10, P=0.920), surgical risks (8.95 vs 9.45, P=0.462), postoperative care (9.30 vs 8.88, P=0.627), visual prognosis (8.55 vs 9.55, P=0.118), or total score (44.4 vs 46.5, P=0.792). Nonetheless, 65.0% of Vidscrip patients reported enhanced understanding after viewing, 65.0% reported fewer questions or concerns, and 90.0% felt the platform would be a helpful adjunct for procedural physicians. Conclusion: Supplemental condition-specific video education did not significantly improve postoperative patient-reported understanding compared with standard counseling alone, although most patients in the video group reported that it enhanced their understanding and considered it a helpful adjunct. Most patients continued to prefer in-person communication for clarification and follow-up discussion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.