Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42634709›Full record

ArticleVeterinary world2026

Effects of cassava waste- and tofu waste-based concentrate formulations on feed intake, nutrient digestibility, growth performance, and economic returns of Madura and Madrasin bulls under smallholder production systems.

Kusmartono Kusmartono, Mashudi Mashudi, Poespitasari Hazanah Ndaru, Aprilia Dwi Kartika Karen Jean Harper, Stephen Todd Morris

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary world, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kusmartono KusmartonoAnimal Science Study Program, Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Animal Science, Universitas Brawijaya, Malang 65145, Indonesia.
Mashudi MashudiAnimal Science Study Program, Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Animal Science, Universitas Brawijaya, Malang 65145, Indonesia.
Poespitasari Hazanah NdaruAnimal Science Study Program, Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Animal Science, Universitas Brawijaya, Malang 65145, Indonesia.
Aprilia Dwi Kartika Karen Jean HarperAnimal Science Study Program, Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Animal Science, Universitas Brawijaya, Malang 65145, Indonesia.
Stephen Todd MorrisAnimal Science Study Program, Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Animal Science, Universitas Brawijaya, Malang 65145, Indonesia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Aim: Feed scarcity and the high cost of commercial concentrates remain major constraints to beef production under Indonesian smallholder systems. Agricultural by-products such as cassava and tofu waste offer potential low-cost alternatives, but information on their combined utilization and breed-specific responses remains limited. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of different cassava waste- and tofu waste-based concentrate formulations on feed intake, nutrient digestibility, growth performance, and economic returns in indigenous Madura and Madrasin (Madura × Limousin) bulls. Materials and Methods: Forty bulls (20 Madura and 20 Madrasin; 2.0-2.5 years old) were used in a 2 × 4 factorial experiment arranged in a randomized complete block design. Four concentrate formulations containing increasing levels of cassava waste (19%-34%) and decreasing levels of tofu waste (20%-5%) were supplied together with native grass. Feed chemical composition was determined, and dry matter intake (DMI), nutrient intake, digestibility coefficients, liveweight gain (LWG), feed conversion ratio (FCR), and income over feed cost (IOFC) were measured. Data were analyzed using mixed-model analysis of variance. Results: Increasing cassava waste inclusion enhanced DMI, with the highest value observed in Madrasin bulls receiving the T4 diet (7.19 kg/day). Dry matter digestibility ranged from 75.06% to 79.77%, whereas organic matter digestibility ranged from 76.77% to 81.21%. Crude protein digestibility remained relatively stable among treatments. Despite differences in intake and digestibility, LWG (0.62-0.83 kg/day) and FCR (7.58-9.64) were not significantly affected by dietary treatments. Madrasin bulls consistently exhibited greater nutrient intake, superior fiber utilization, higher average daily gain, and greater economic returns than Madura bulls. IOFC reached a maximum of IDR 44,456/day in Madrasin bulls. Importantly, increasing cassava waste from 19% to 34% did not adversely affect growth performance or profitability, indicating that dietary flexibility could be achieved without compromising productive efficiency. Conclusion: Cassava waste and tofu waste can be effectively combined in concentrate formulations for beef cattle under smallholder conditions. Inclusion of cassava waste up to 34% maintained growth performance, feed efficiency, and profitability while reducing dependence on commercial concentrates. Madrasin bulls exhibited superior productive and economic performance; however, balanced breeding strategies are required to enhance productivity while supporting conservation of the indigenous Madura cattle. These findings provide practical evidence for developing resilient, low-cost, and sustainable feeding systems based on locally available agricultural by-products.

Indexed as

agricultural by-productsbeef cattlecassava wastefeed formulationincome over feed costMadrasin bullsMadura bullssmallholder production systems

Identifiers

PMID42634709
PMCPMC13500153

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.