ArticleCureus2026
Management of Peripartum Cardiomyopathy With and Without Bromocriptine: A Comparative Study.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionPeripartum cardiomyopathy is an uncommon but potentially severe cause of pregnancy-associated systolic heart failure. Bromocriptine has been proposed as an adjunctive therapy because it suppresses prolactin release, but its interpretation depends on the background heart failure regimen, dose, anticoagulation practice, and patient selection. This study compared short-term left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) recovery in patients managed with standard therapy with or without low-dose bromocriptine.
methodsThis prospective comparative observational study was conducted at a tertiary care center in South India from October 2020 to October 2021. A total of 50 patients with peripartum cardiomyopathy and LVEF below 45% were analyzed according to treatment received. Group A (n=25) received bromocriptine 2.5 mg once daily for one week in addition to standard pregnancy/postpartum-compatible heart failure therapy, and Group B (n=25) received standard therapy alone. Treatment allocation was not randomized, and no allocation concealment was used. Echocardiography was used to assess LVEF at baseline, discharge, and one month. Continuous variables were compared with the independent samples Student's t-test, and categorical variables were compared with the chi-square test or Fisher's exact test.
resultsBaseline LVEF did not differ significantly between Group A and Group B (38.36 ± 2.40% vs 39.00 ± 1.19%; p = 0.238). Important baseline differences were present, including gestational age at presentation (33.76 ± 7.84 vs 37.72 ± 1.57 weeks; p = 0.017), body mass index (22.49 ± 3.10 vs 24.01 ± 1.75 kg/m2; p = 0.037), comorbidity distribution (p = 0.033), electrocardiographic findings (p = 0.033), and chest radiographic findings (p = 0.004). At discharge, mean LVEF was 47.52 ± 2.52% in Group A and 46.56 ± 2.82% in Group B (p = 0.210). At one month, mean LVEF was higher in Group A than in Group B (57.00 ± 1.71% vs 49.84 ± 1.38%; p < 0.001). Gestational age at delivery (p = 0.031) and birth weight (p = 0.010) differed between the groups; neonatal intensive care unit admission did not (p = 0.560). Recorded Apgar score distributions were retained as abstracted, but the uniform control-group values require cautious interpretation.
conclusionBoth groups showed improvement in left ventricular function. Low-dose one-week bromocriptine was associated with greater one-month LVEF in this cohort, but the non-randomized design, baseline imbalances, limited documentation of background therapy and anticoagulation, and short follow-up preclude causal claims. The findings should be interpreted as hypothesis-generating and require confirmation in larger protocolized studies with adjustment for confounding and longer follow-up.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.