ArticleCureus2026
Integration in Medicine-Pediatrics Residency Programs: A Mixed-Methods Study.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background There are a variety of combined residency training programs, including an increasing number of medicine-pediatrics (Med-Peds) residency programs. Successful integration of these residents into the learning environments of both departments is important to train competent, successful physicians. Little is known about the factors that contribute to successful integration. Objective To assess Med-Peds integration and explore factors essential for the successful integration of combined residents into their host departments. Methods To further elaborate on findings from a national survey, a convenience sample of 33 Med-Peds program leaders participated in focus groups of 3-5 participants to explore factors associated with successful integration of Med-Peds programs into their host departments. Data were collected in March 2025 during the national meeting of the Med-Peds Program Directors Association (MPPDA). Focus group transcripts were analyzed using inductive qualitative analysis. Results One hundred percent of programs that participated in focus groups (33/33) were either "somewhat well-integrated" or "well-integrated" into their medicine department, and 30/33 (91%) were "somewhat well-integrated" or "well-integrated" into their pediatrics department. There was no clear statistical difference between the medicine and pediatrics departments (p = 0.054). The focus groups identified four factors associated with successful integration of Med-Peds programs: residents' involvement in cross-program activities, the development of personal relationships across departments, the program's administrative inclusion, and its cultivation of programmatic identity. Conclusions Med-Peds programs are well integrated into their host departments, according to program leaders. Fostering these qualities of integration is critical for successful combined programs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.