ReviewCurrent addiction reports2026
Neural Correlates of Emotion Regulation in Substance Use.
Review in Current addiction reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose of Review: Emotion regulation (ER) is a central process implicated in the development, maintenance, and escalation of substance use (SU) and substance use disorders (SUDs). Advances in functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) have enabled characterization of neural systems underlying emotional processing, inhibitory control under emotional conditions, and deliberate ER in individuals engaging in SU. This review synthesizes recent neuroimaging findings related to ER and SU across three primary paradigms: emotional Go/No-Go tasks, cognitive reappraisal tasks, and implicit ER paradigms. Recent Findings: Across paradigms, SU is associated with altered engagement of frontolimbic, salience, and frontoparietal control networks, particularly during negative emotional contexts. Emotional Go/No-Go studies suggest that SU-related differences are most pronounced when inhibitory demands intersect with emotional salience. Cognitive reappraisal findings indicate disrupted recruitment and coordination of prefrontal-limbic systems during deliberate ER associated with SU, though results remain limited and mixed. Implicit ER paradigms further demonstrate context-dependent alterations in limbic reactivity and prefrontal connectivity associated with SU, with developmental and sex-specific patterns emerging in adolescent samples. Longitudinal findings suggest that some neural differences may precede SU initiation, whereas others may reflect consequences of chronic substance exposure. Summary: Collectively, this literature indicates that altered coordination between emotional salience detection and cognitive control systems represents a key neurobiological mechanism linking ER and SU. Future work integrating longitudinal, ecologically valid, and intervention-based designs will be critical for clarifying directionality and identifying modifiable neural targets to inform prevention and treatment efforts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.