Trial reportNursing open2026
Exploring a Facilitator-Enabled Flexible iSupport for Dementia Program: An Internal Pilot Mixed-Methods Study.
Trial report in Nursing open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsTo assess the feasibility, fidelity and preliminary impact of a facilitator-enabled flexible iSupport for dementia program for family carers of people with dementia in a 6-month intervention period.
designThis study was a multi-centre, mixed-methods, parallel-group, internal, block-pilot, randomised controlled trial with an embedded qualitative descriptive study.
methodsThe study was conducted across two community aged care services and two tertiary hospitals in Australia. Participants were recruited between June 2022 and April 2023. Quantitative data were collected via surveys at baseline and 6 months. Qualitative data were obtained from carer support group meetings and interviews.
resultsEighty-four carers were enrolled. The recruitment rate was 10% of eligible carers who were approached, and retention in the intervention group at 6 months was 70%. Findings indicate that carers engaged with the program, although engagement varied across components including use of the iSupport manual, participation in online peer support meetings and interaction via WhatsApp. Preliminary analyses suggested a possible trend toward lower behavioural problems among people living with dementia and lower carer distress responses to these behaviours in the intervention group. However, there was no clear evidence of effects on carers' quality of life, perceived social support, self-efficacy, or the quality of life of people living with dementia. Findings from the pilot informed modifications to enhance the feasibility of the main trial.
conclusionThis internal pilot study demonstrated the feasibility of a facilitator-enabled iSupport program and provided preliminary estimates suggesting potential benefits for behavioural outcomes. The results informed refinements to the main trial and highlight the importance of flexible, facilitator-supported interventions for carers of people living with dementia. Further research in a fully powered trial is required to confirm effectiveness. IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION AND PATIENT CARE: Carers of people living with dementia in the community valued the flexible support provided by iSupport facilitators. This support can be delivered in multiple formats, including online meetings, WhatsApp groups and tailored one-to-one facilitator support, allowing flexibility to meet diverse caregiver needs. Such an approach is particularly relevant for nurse-led multidisciplinary services and settings that provide remote care. In addition, this study offers practical insights into feasibility considerations, such as recruitment, engagement and retention, that may inform the design and implementation of future nursing and community-based interventions. IMPACT: This study provides preliminary evidence on how facilitator-enabled flexible support can be implemented in community settings, informing the design and delivery of future dementia care interventions. Findings suggest that carers can engage with and benefit from structured, facilitator-supported interventions delivered in flexible formats and may experience potential benefits that warrant further evaluation. Facilitator-enabled flexible support has the potential to complement existing services for carers of people living with dementia and may help address unmet support needs in community settings. REPORTING
methodWe adhered to the CONSORT 2010 statement and its extension for randomised pilot and feasibility trials. We also reported in accordance with the Good Reporting of A Mixed Methods Study (GRAMMS). PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: Participants in this study included carers of people living with dementia in the community, supported by health and social care professionals from the four participating organisations.
trial registrationThe randomised controlled trial protocol was registered with the Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (Registration No. ACTRN12622000199718).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.