ArticleYonsei medical journal2026
Development of a Multimodal Machine Learning Model for Predicting Second Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures.
Article in Yonsei medical journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeOsteoporosis increases the probability of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCF), and the resultant pain severely limits physical activity and increases mortality and morbidity. This study aimed to develop a high-precision multimodal prediction model to forecast the risk of a second OVCF. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis retrospective study included 178 patients from a single institution with a first OVCF between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2019. The study dataset included 18 preoperative clinical variables, including demographics, medications, comorbidities, bone mineral density (BMD), body mass index, trunk fat/muscle ratio from dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA), and imaging data. We employed an intermediate-fusion multimodal approach using deep neural networks, principal component analysis (PCA), and traditional classifiers.
resultsThe final PCA-fusion+random forest model achieved strong internal cross-validation performance [accuracy 0.979, F1-score 0.969, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) 0.998; mean across folds]. External validation in an independent cohort demonstrated preserved discriminative ability (accuracy 0.904, F1-score 0.902, AUROC 0.923), albeit lower than internal estimates, suggesting dataset shift and possible overfitting. In a sensitivity analysis, a clinical/DEXA-only model also showed good discrimination, but the multimodal fusion model achieved higher recall, F1-score, and AUROC/area under the precision-recall curve, supporting the added value of imaging features. Feature importance and Shapley Additive Explanations highlighted DEXA body-composition measures (e.g., gynoid/android/trunk fat and tissue) and image-derived components as influential.
conclusionWe developed a high-performing multimodal machine learning model for predicting a second OVCF in patients with prior fractures. By integrating clinical and imaging data, the model demonstrated strong predictive accuracy and interpretability, supported by feature importance analysis and visualization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.