ArticleHealth promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals2026
Nicotine Pouch Advertising and Sales in Australia: A Qualitative Study of Younger People's Experiences.
Article in Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Nicotine Pouch Advertising and Sales in Australia: A Qualitative Study of Younger People's Experiences.Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
issue addressedTheir position as a target demographic of the tobacco industry means younger people are best placed to provide information on the activities of industry actors in relation to nicotine pouches. Accordingly, we aimed to qualitatively examine younger people's exposure to pouch advertising, from where pouches are being sourced, and any notable retailer practices and industry innovations.
methodsAustralians aged 16-39 years were recruited to participate in one of 12 focus groups held February to April 2025. Groups ranged in size from 6 to 10 participants, with a total of 98 participants in attendance. Data were synthesised using template analysis.
resultsAlmost all groups reported being exposed to nicotine pouch advertising, despite such advertising being illegal in Australia. Social media was the most common source of advertising exposure, with TikTok the most frequently cited platform. Participants reported that advertising typically featured attractive influencers portraying pouches as "cool" and describing nicotine as "natural". Tobacconists and convenience stores were key product sources. Few retailer practices were identified, with these broadly relating to product cost and inducements.
conclusionsResults provide initial insights into the insidiousness of the marketing strategies being adopted to sell nicotine pouches to younger people. SO WHAT?: Findings highlight an urgent need for action that protects younger people from tobacco companies and the influencers they engage to promote their addictive products. Action should include robust regulation of the online environment and holding social media platforms responsible for their failure to enforce policies prohibiting product advertising and sales.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.