ArticleComprehensive reviews in food science and food safety2026
Pesticide Residues, Gut Microbiota, and Gastrointestinal Outcomes: A Scoping Review of Human Evidence.
Article in Comprehensive reviews in food science and food safety, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Pesticide Residues, Gut Microbiota, and Gastrointestinal Outcomes: A Scoping Review of Human Evidence.Comprehensive reviews in food science and food safety · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Vegetables anchor healthy-diet recommendations yet are the principal nonoccupational route by which residues of organophosphate (OP), pyrethroid, neonicotinoid, organochlorine (OC), and glyphosate herbicide enter the diet, with the gut microbiota a plausible mediator linking these residues to functional gastrointestinal (GI) and inflammatory bowel outcomes. We conducted a scoping review following the PRISMA extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR), searching PubMed (2010 to April 2026) with mandatory backward and forward citation tracing for human studies of dietary or biomarker-confirmed pesticide exposure against gut microbiota, intestinal barrier and inflammation, functional GI disorders, or inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Risk of bias (RoB) was appraised with ROBINS-E and Cochrane RoB 2.0, and evidence was synthesized in a 60-cell pesticide-class × outcome gap matrix. Twenty-eight papers were retained; 20 full-text-extracted human studies entered the synthesis, populating 20 of 60 cells (33%). The strongest convergent within-scope signal was OC exposure × IBD, where three cohorts agreed in direction (hazard ratios 1.56-1.61; Faroese risk ratio 3.04 on 37 cases). As a microbiota-mediation exemplar for an adjacent non-GI endpoint, the MCMC Nanjing pregnancy cohort linked a pesticide environmental risk score to gestational diabetes (adjusted odds ratio 4.5; 95% CI, 1.4-13.8; internal-validation area under the curve 0.83), with a Dorea-branch microbiota mediating part of the path. Glyphosate × IBD and neonicotinoid × any GI outcome remained empty. RoB centered on Moderate (11 of 22 rated cohorts), with six elevated-bias contributors. Biomarker-anchored prospective cohorts targeting the empty cells should be the next research priority.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.