ArticleScientific reports2026
Dietary patterns in western patients with hidradenitis suppurativa: a cross-sectional study using the rapid prime diet quality screener.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic inflammatory skin disease with multifactorial pathogenesis, in which dietary factors may play a role. This cross-sectional study evaluated dietary patterns in 71 HS patients in a Western population using the validated Rapid Prime Diet Quality Screener (rPDQS) and compared the results with those of a healthy historical US validation cohort representative of the Western diet. The HS cohort had significantly lower mean rPDQS scores than reference group (11 ± 4 vs. 12 ± 4, p = 0.005) and higher rates of overweight/obesity (81% vs. 59%). Processed meat consumption was significantly higher (p < 0.001), nut and nut products intake significantly lower (p < 0.001) in the HS group. Beyond objective dietary assessment, patient-reported outcomes highlighted diet as a perceived factor influencing disease: 27% reported diet-related factors as negatively affecting HS, whereas 28% cited diet-particularly healthy eating-as beneficial. Our findings suggest that HS patients may follow less healthy dietary patterns than the reference group and that patient perceptions of diet may represent an additional relevant dimension. The results highlight potential dietary targets for intervention and suggest that both dietary patterns and patient perceptions of diet may play a role in HS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.