ArticleScientific reports2026
GC-rich regions affect amplification efficiency of neighboring amplicons in qPCR and digital PCR.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
DNA polymerase chain reaction (PCR) has been widely used for the quantitation of DNA and RNA samples. Multiple factors can affect amplification efficiency, including GC-rich regions. The proximity effects of GC-rich regions on the amplification efficiency of neighboring amplicons that are not themselves GC-rich are not fully understood. Using a GFP-6.0Kb recombinant adeno-associated virus (rAAV) vector plasmid containing a 300 bp region with 79% GC content, we evaluated the effect of this GC-rich region on six amplicons (38-61% GC) at varying distances from it in nanoplate digital PCR (ndPCR), real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR), and droplet digital PCR (ddPCR). In ndPCR, amplification efficiency decreased progressively with proximity to the GC-rich region, with the nearest amplicon yielding only 9% of the reference value. Restriction enzyme digestion that physically separated amplicons from the GC-rich region restored efficiency to approximately 100%. In qPCR, the effect on quantitation depended on whether the standard curve material and the sample shared similar neighboring GC-rich sequence context. The effect was not observed in ddPCR under the conditions tested. Additives including DMSO and betaine, and physical separation by restriction enzyme digestion or sonication, mitigated the effect in ndPCR and qPCR. These findings may have broad practical implications for PCR-based quantitation, as GC-rich regions are prevalent in many mammalian promoters, enhancers, and other gene regulatory elements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.