ArticleMicrosystems & nanoengineering2026
Balancing surface chemistry and biocompatibility: an analysis of poly(dimethylsiloxane) and polyethylene terephthalate membrane bonding methods in Lab-on-a-Chip systems for cell culture.
Article in Microsystems & nanoengineering, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Next to the poly(dimethylsiloxane) (PDMS), polyethylene terephthalate (PET) is the material increasingly used in the fabrication of Lab-on-a-Chip (LoC) systems. It results from their excellent biocompatibility and straightforward fabrication of microstructures. The integration of PDMS and PET requires chemical modification of surfaces, such as the use of silane-based coupling agents (3-aminopropyltriethoxysilane (APTES) and 3-glycidyloxypropyltrimethoxysilane (GPTMS). However, this method is often ineffective in achieving stable, leak-proof bonding, with the potential for high cytotoxicity. In response to these challenges, we tested whether polydopamine (PDA) could be a promising alternative method for PDMS and PET bonding. We compared two PDMS-PET surface bonding methods, such as APTES/GPTMS and PDA, and we proved that PDA coatings created strong, stable bonds between PDMS and PET, providing a biocompatible surface that supports cell adhesion and culture without cytotoxic effects. The results highlight the significant advantages of PDA in developing PDMS-PET-based LoC systems, allowing for more reliable and complex in vitro models for drug testing and disease research.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.