ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2026
Risk prediction model and intervention strategies for intraoperative hypothermia in robotic-assisted urological surgery.
Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To develop a risk prediction model for intraoperative hypothermia in patients undergoing robotic-assisted urological surgery and formulate hierarchical warming strategies. This single-centre retrospective study calculated the sample size using G*Power 3.1. A total of 487 patients admitted to our hospital from May 2023 to May 2025 were included after correcting for 10% invalid samples (minimum required: 438). Hypothermia was defined as an intraoperative nasopharyngeal temperature < 36 ℃. Patients were divided into hypothermia (n = 61) and non-hypothermia (n = 426) groups. Lasso regression was used to screen variables, and a binary logistic regression model with a nomogram was constructed and internally validated by 1,000 bootstrap resamples. Operating room temperature, the absence of active warming measures, age, body mass index and preoperative baseline core temperature were independent risk factors (P < 0.05). The model had an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.928 (sensitivity 91.8%, specificity 80.5%, Youden index 0.723). The corrected AUC was 0.915 after validation. The Hosmer-Lemeshow test (χ²=7.514, P = 0.0897) showed good calibration, and the decision curve analysis demonstrated significant clinical net benefit. The prediction model has excellent performance, which can accurately identify high-risk patients and guide personalised perioperative warming to reduce intraoperative hypothermia incidence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.