ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2026
Multi-task learning for forensic age and sex estimation using large foundation models on pelvic radiographs: a multi-center study.
Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Age and sex estimation are essential tasks in forensic science, law enforcement and disaster victim identification. Previous methods hardly implement the two tasks simultaneously due to limitations of models and the complexity of the multitask. We propose a novel framework based on large foundation model (LFM) to conduct multi-task estimation workflow to address the problem. In this study, large-scale pelvic radiographs (6712 samples) aged from 6.00 to 30.99 years from three independent medical centers were collected and evaluated. The method achieved mean absolute error (MAE) of 0.569 (95% CI: 0.540-0.598) years and root mean squared error (RMSE) of 0.749 in age estimation, with an MAE of 0.564 (95%CI: 0.522-0.606) for males and 0.575 (95%CI: 0.535-0.615) for females. For sex estimation, an accuracy of 0.905 and F1 score of 0.904 were achieved, with accuracy ranging from 0.790 to 1.000 across age groups. The proposed framework demonstrated competitive performance compared with the evaluated deep learning and manual methods on the studied datasets. The Grad-CAM heatmaps show that the model's regions of interest (ROIs) mainly concentrate on bony structures including the pubic symphysis, iliac crest, greater trochanter of the femur, and pelvic shape, providing preliminary interpretability evidence for the model. The proposed LFM-based framework demonstrates promising performance for multi-task age and sex estimation and may serve as a supportive tool for forensic assessment, subject to further validation in broader populations and real-world forensic settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42634045What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.