ReviewInternational journal of legal medicine2026
Digital PCR in forensic genetics: principles, applications, and challenges.
Review in International journal of legal medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Digital PCR (dPCR) has emerged as a transformative technology in forensic genetics, offering absolute quantification of nucleic acids without the need for standard curves. This review comprehensively summarizes the principles, analytical advantages, and diverse applications of dPCR in forensic medicine, while also addressing current challenges and future perspectives. By partitioning samples into thousands to millions of individual reactions, dPCR enables high-precision quantification, exceptional sensitivity for rare variants, and robust tolerance to PCR inhibitors and degraded DNA-characteristics particularly advantageous for analyzing challenging forensic specimens such as trace, degraded, and inhibitor-laden samples. Key applications discussed include DNA mixture deconvolution, differentiation of monozygotic twins through low-frequency variant detection, forensic age estimation based on DNA methylation and other molecular markers, body fluid and tissue identification using RNA and DNA methylation markers, and species identification of non-human biological samples. Despite its significant potential, the widespread implementation of dPCR in routine forensic practice is constrained by limited multiplexing capacity, higher per-sample costs, and the absence of standardized forensic guidelines. Future advancements in microfluidic integration, multiplexing technologies, and portable platform development are expected to further expand the utility of dPCR, positioning it as a powerful complementary tool in forensic casework, particularly for complex and compromised samples.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42634044What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.