ArticleScientific reports2026
Enhanced classification and identification of bacterial and viral microorganisms by integration of MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry with artificial intelligence.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The accurate and rapid identification of bacterial pathogens is essential in clinical setups and medical biodefense. Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization Time-Of-Flight (MALDI-TOF) mass spectrometry has emerged as a powerful tool for fast and reliable microbial identification. This study assesses the performance of eight Machine Learning (ML) and two Deep Learning (DL) models trained using 5-fold cross validation in classifying microorganisms in a series of experiments based on MALDI-TOF mass spectra (n = 255) generated internally from seven cultured bacteria and five viral agents. The results showed that up to seven models achieved consistently robust classification across various tasks, including binary classification of viruses from bacteria and Gram-positive from Gram-negative bacteria, as well as multi-class classification of individual bacterial and viral species. Subsequently, we cross-validated three from our top-performing models, Extra Trees Classifier, Support Vector Classifier and 1-D Convolutional Neural Network, on Gram type and multi-class classification of individual bacterial species against an external dataset selected from a large MALDI-TOF MS database of highly pathogenic bacteria (curated by Robert Koch Institute). Among these, the Extra Trees Classifier consistently achieved the highest average accuracy and F1-score in both Gram type classification and species-level identification, demonstrating superior generalization across datasets. Its ensemble architecture proved particularly effective in capturing subtle spectral patterns associated with microbial cell wall composition and protein expression profiles. These results underscore the strong potential of this model to enhance MALDI-TOF-based classification frameworks in clinical microbiology and biodefense applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.