Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42634018›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Evaluation of a novel multi-purpose ophthalmic block simulator amongst ophthalmology trainees.

Jessica Q H Choo, Elizabeth W L Lim, Chelsea Q L Tan, Jordan Lee, Royston K Y Tan, Shamira A Perera

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jessica Q H ChooSingapore National Eye Center, 11 Third Hospital Avenue, Singapore, 168751, Singapore. jessica-choo@hotmail.com.
Elizabeth W L LimSingapore National Eye Center, 11 Third Hospital Avenue, Singapore, 168751, Singapore.
Chelsea Q L TanNational University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Jordan LeeSunshine Coast Hospital and Health Service, Sunshine Coast, Birtinya, QLD, Australia.
Royston K Y TanSingapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore National Eye Centre, Singapore, Singapore.
Shamira A PereraSingapore National Eye Center, 11 Third Hospital Avenue, Singapore, 168751, Singapore. shamira.perera@singhealth.com.sg.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Training to perform ophthalmic blocks is often done on actual patients by trial and error. Higher complication rates and poor patient experience occur from suboptimal blocks. We assess the efficacy of a novel ophthalmic block simulator via a pilot study. The production process involved 3D-printing and improvisation with readily available materials that provided excellent reproducibility of a real-life experience. A prospective pilot study on ophthalmology trainees in a single centre via a 3-pronged approach before and after a supervised training workshop on the simulator was performed. Outcomes include procedural confidence, competence, accurate needle positioning during peribulbar block and degree of post-procedural akinesia. There were significant improvements in trainee self-ranked confidence (7.57 ± 1.27 to 8.57 ± 1.13, p = 0.018) and competence (7.71 ± 0.95 to 8.43 ± 0.98, p = 0.047) (n = 7). There was improvement in consultant-rated akinesia, competence and confidence (38.1% ± 29.9% to 34.8% ± 20.7% p = 0.766, 7.63 ± 1.51 to 7.90 ± 0.66 p = 0.585, and 7.57±1.64 to 7.80±0.92 p = 0.698) (18 assessments pre-workshop, 20 assessments post-workshop), and mean accuracy in blocks performed on the simulator after training with the simulator (4.17 ± 1.27 to 4.83 ± 0.389, n = 12, p = 0.054) although all these were statistically insignificant. In summary, this is a useful, portable and low-cost ophthalmic block simulator that allows trainees to gain confidence and competence in performing these procedures.

Indexed as

Nerve BlockOphthalmologySimulation TrainingClinical CompetenceHumansPilot ProjectsPrinting, Three-DimensionalProspective Studies

Identifiers

PMID42634018
PMCPMC13500840

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.