ArticleBrain, behavior, and immunity2026
Perceived everyday discrimination and leukocyte gene expression in a nationally representative sample of U.S. Adults.
Article in Brain, behavior, and immunity, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Perceived everyday discrimination is a psychosocial stressor that is adversely associated with biological health. These associations may be partly mediated by the modulation of leukocyte gene expression through stress-related neuroendocrine pathways. The Conserved Transcriptional Response to Adversity (CTRA) provides a framework for examining how everyday discrimination may alter molecular signaling pathways through coordinated changes in gene expression. This study quantified associations between perceived everyday discrimination and CTRA patterns in a diverse, nationally representative sample of U.S. adults. Data were drawn from Wave 5 (2016-2017) of the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent to Adult Health (Add Health). Perceived everyday discrimination was assessed using the validated Everyday Discrimination Scale and standardized using z-scores. CTRA gene expression was evaluated using an a priori-defined set of 52 genes. Weighted regression models tested associations between everyday discrimination and CTRA, sequentially adjusting for sociodemographic, behavioral, clinical, and technical covariates. We found no evidence of a linear association between discrimination and CTRA. However, exploratory analyses suggested a non-linear (inverted-U) relationship (b = -0.023, 95% CI: -0.044, -0.001, p = 0.036); the association was directionally positive at lower exposure but reached significance only at the highest levels, where CTRA expression declined as discrimination increased.. This pattern indicates that the relationships of discrimination with gene expression may not follow a straightforward dose-response pattern, instead reaching a threshold beyond which additional exposure elicits reduced biological reactivity, possibly reflecting adaptation or coping among those exposed to chronic discrimination.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.