Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42633694›Full record

ArticleNursing inquiry2026

The AI Adaptation Paradox: Navigating Professional Relevance and Sustainable Integration in Nursing.

Amina Silva

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nursing inquiry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Amina SilvaSchool of Nursing, Brock University, St. Catharines, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0972-8212

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial intelligence is increasingly integrated across nursing education, practice, research, and healthcare systems, yet its long-term sustainability, economic viability, and organizational implications remain uncertain. This raises the question of how the profession should adapt when both rapid integration and cautious delay carry risk. In this discussion paper, I introduce two concepts to examine that question. The AI adaptation paradox describes the simultaneous pressure on nursing to accelerate AI integration to preserve professional relevance while operating under substantial technological, organizational, and economic uncertainty. Adaptive overcommitment describes how a profession may embed technologies into competencies, workflows, educational systems, and organizational infrastructures faster than evidence on their long-term sustainability and value can emerge. Drawing on contemporary literature and interdisciplinary examples from healthcare, education, and technology, I trace these dynamics across workforce preparedness, economic feasibility, organizational resilience, equity, and professional influence, and propose reflexive adaptation as a way of preserving the capacity to revise commitments as evidence evolves. The paper does not argue for slower or faster adoption; it argues that nursing's central challenge is adapting while retaining the flexibility to shape that transformation.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceNursingHumans

Identifiers

PMID42633694
PMCPMC13500099

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.