Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42633692›Full record

ArticleJournal of evaluation in clinical practice2026

Salience as an Integrative Process in Symptom Formation: A Conceptual Analysis for Generalist Practice.

Fumihiko Matsuoka

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of evaluation in clinical practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Fumihiko MatsuokaRokkasho Medical Center, Japan Association for Development of Community Medicine (JADECOM), Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0009-0004-2029-9422

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundClinicians in generalist practice frequently encounter symptoms that fluctuate across bodily, interpersonal and situational contexts, often without corresponding changes in identifiable structural pathology. Existing frameworks, such as the biopsychosocial model and the patient-centred clinical method, have broadened the understanding of symptom experience, but they do not fully describe how bodily signals, subjective experience, attention and context are integrated into symptom perception.

aimsTo propose salience as an interpretive process integrating bodily signals, attention and contextual meaning for understanding symptom formation and fluctuation in generalist practice. DESIGN AND

settingA practice-informed conceptual analysis situated within generalist outpatient care.

methodsThis paper develops a conceptual framework through interpretive integration of selected concepts from generalist practice, interoception, predictive processing, narrative medicine and symptom perception research. The analysis was informed by longitudinal clinical experience in community-based outpatient generalist practice, not by a formal observational data set. A clinical vignette is used as an illustrative analytic example.

resultsSalience is conceptualized as the dynamic process through which certain bodily signals acquire experiential and clinical prominence within specific attentional, interpersonal and contextual conditions. The framework describes symptom formation as a process in which bodily signals become foregrounded through salience allocation, rather than as direct reflections of pathophysiological intensity alone.

conclusionThe salience framework may help clinicians understand fluctuating and context-dependent symptoms by linking bodily signals, subjective experience, narrative context and clinical intervention.

Indexed as

General PracticeAttentionHumansPhysician-Patient Relations

Identifiers

PMID42633692
PMCPMC13500064

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.