ArticleDevelopmental science2026
Distinct Neural Signatures of Novel Word-Referent Mapping in Monolingual and Bilingual Toddlers.
Article in Developmental science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Evidence suggests that bilingualism impacts children's lexical and brain development. Yet, the development of the brain's language network in early childhood-a period marked by rapid vocabulary growth-remains poorly understood, particularly with respect to differences between bilingual and monolingual children. This study used eye tracking and functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) to examine the cortical representations of lexical acquisition in frontal and temporal lobes. We relied on a fast mapping task that included three trial types: Familiar (familiar label-referent mapping; e.g., ball), Disambiguation (novel label-referent mapping; e.g., dax), and Retention (long term retention of two novel referents). Sixty English-learning monolingual and bilingual children (27-32 months), from a majority English-speaking society, participated in the study. Results revealed that monolinguals showed increased looking to the novel referent during disambiguation trials, with a similar trend during retention. In contrast, bilinguals did not show reliable novel label-referent mapping behavior. Brain activity differences between the language groups emerged in right temporal regions during disambiguation trials, with bilinguals showing increasing HbO activity in this region, than monolinguals. Bilinguals' right hemisphere greater activity may reflect reduced automaticity in the use of disambiguation. These results offer foundational insight into neural markers supporting lexical acquisition, especially for those who may struggle in language acquisition such as late talkers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.