ArticleDevelopmental science2026
Can You Feel My Pain? Neural-Behavioural Changes in Caregiver-Infant Dyads During Ostracism.
Article in Developmental science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Behavioural and neural coordination during infant-caregiver social interaction is crucial for early emotional development and effective emotional regulation abilities later in life. This is particularly relevant to help infants deal with challenging social situations, such as being excluded from a group of others (ostracism). The coupling of neural and behavioural responses to ostracism in infants and caregivers has never been investigated in infants and caregivers simultaneously, nor how early infants perceive ostracism and how caregivers couple their behavioural and neural signals with them. In the current preregistered hyperscanning study, we investigated the effect of ostracism on neural and behavioural responses, inter-brain synchrony (N = 34) and behavioural synchrony in caregiver-infant dyads (N = 41) using a ball-game. We compared how theta power, inter-brain synchronization, and affective responses changed during ostracism. 5-7-month-old infants and their caregivers both showed increased affective responses. However, only infants, but not their caregivers showed higher theta power during ostracism. Inter-brain neural synchrony was not generally higher in the exclusion condition compared to the control conditions and highly dependent to specific contexts. These findings indicate a co-regulation process, suggesting that "more synchrony" is not necessarily better for interaction quality. Instead, effective caregiver-infant interaction may rely on the flexible modulation of synchrony, shifting between more and less synchronization depending on contextual demands. Overall, our study is the first to show that infants are sensitive to cues of ostracism experience from 5 months of age on and provides the first evidence of caregiver-infant behavioural and neural synchrony in response to ostracism. A video abstract of this article can be viewed at https://youtu.be/pXj3yu7MNw0.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.