ArticleADMET & DMPK2026
Extracellular vesicles and their translational therapeutic potential.
Article in ADMET & DMPK, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and purpose: Mesenchymal stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles (MSC-EVs) have emerged as a promising cell-free therapy for osteoarthritis (OA). However, their transition into clinical therapeutics is constrained by unstandardized pharmacokinetics and heterogeneous preclinical reporting. Experimental approach: A meta-analysis of preclinical in vivo OA models evaluating MSC-EV therapy was conducted. Study quality was rigorously assessed using MISEV 2023 (Minimal Information for Studies of Extracellular Vesicles, 2023) criteria and the SYRCLE (Systematic Review Centre for Laboratory animal Experimentation) risk-of-bias tool. Quantitative synthesis was performed for the Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OARSI) histological score, reporting pooled mean differences (MDs) and 95 % confidence intervals (95% CIs), along with heterogeneity ( Key results: MSC-EV administration conferred robust structural protection against cartilage degradation. Quantitative synthesis of human-derived MSC-EVs (26 studies) significantly reduced OARSI scores (MD -3.27, 95% CI -4.66 to -1.88; Conclusion: MSC-EVs demonstrate highly potent, cross-species efficacy in attenuating OA progression. However, clinical translation is critically bottlenecked by a lack of ADMET (absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion and toxicity) compliance. Future research must prioritize standardized particle-based dosing, in vivo pharmacokinetic tracking, and rigorous cargo-function validation to enable regulatory approval.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.