Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42633430›Full record

Trial reportJournal of pain research2026

Myofascial Trigger Point-Augmented Acupuncture vs Conventional Acupuncture for Early- to Mid-Stage Knee Osteoarthritis: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Longyao Zhang, Jiankang Xu, Lingling Jiang, Kuiliang Gao, Hongfei Xue, Yulei Li, Aifeng Liu, Chao Zhang

Abstract readCase ReportsClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of pain research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Longyao Zhang *Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, First Teaching Hospital of Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0001-5363-8575
Jiankang Xu *Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, First Teaching Hospital of Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0009-0005-2753-2976
Lingling Jiang *Teaching and Research Section of Acupuncture-Moxibustion and Tuina, Tianjin Medical College, Tianjin, People's Republic of China.
Kuiliang GaoDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, First Teaching Hospital of Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, People's Republic of China.
Hongfei XueDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, First Teaching Hospital of Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, People's Republic of China.
Yulei LiDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, First Teaching Hospital of Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0009-0006-4950-0024
Aifeng LiuDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, First Teaching Hospital of Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0001-7318-1277
Chao ZhangDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, First Teaching Hospital of Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0003-3310-3754

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To determine whether adding myofascial trigger point (MTrP)-targeted dry needling to conventional acupuncture improves short-term pain and function response in adults with early- to mid-stage knee osteoarthritis (KOA). Patients and methods: In this randomized, assessor-blinded, single-center trial, 106 adults with Kellgren-Lawrence grade II-III KOA were assigned 1:1 to conventional acupuncture or the same regimen plus 3 individualized MTrP-targeted insertions. Both groups received 10 sessions over 2 weeks. The primary outcome was the week-2 composite responder rate, defined as a ≥2-point reduction in visual analog scale (VAS) pain and a ≥6-point improvement in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) function. Secondary outcomes included pain, function, pressure pain threshold (PPT), gait, acceptability, and safety. Results: Of 106 randomized participants, 97 were included in the modified intention-to-treat analysis. At week 2, 47 of 49 participants (95.9%) in the MTrP-augmented group and 42 of 48 (87.5%) in the conventional group were responders (risk difference, 8.4 percentage points [95% CI, -2.5 to 19.3]; risk ratio, 1.10 [95% CI, 0.97 to 1.24]; P =0.13). Exploratory secondary analyses without comprehensive multiplicity adjustment favored MTrP augmentation for VAS pain and WOMAC outcomes. The week-2 between-group difference in gait-speed change was 0.072 m/s (95% CI, 0.040 to 0.103; nominal P <0.001), and group-by-time interactions occurred at 6 of 7 shared peri-knee PPT sites. At week 2, needling pain was 2.45 points higher and acceptability was lower with MTrP augmentation (36.7% vs 72.9%). No serious adverse events or related withdrawals occurred. Conclusion: Adding MTrP-targeted dry needling to conventional acupuncture did not significantly improve the prespecified primary responder outcome; therefore, superiority was not established. Exploratory findings suggested possible incremental benefits through week 14, but these should be weighed against greater procedural pain and substantially lower short-term acceptability.

Indexed as

acupuncturegaitknee osteoarthritismyofascial trigger pointspressure pain thresholdrandomized clinical trial

Identifiers

PMID42633430
PMCPMC13499540

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.