ArticleRisk management and healthcare policy2026
Development and Validation of a Social Influence Scale for Antiviral Therapy Behavior of Patients with Chronic Hepatitis B.
Article in Risk management and healthcare policy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection remains a global health problem with widespread prevalence, yet treatment rates remain persistently low worldwide. Although the impact of social influence on health behaviors has been well confirmed and proven to play a prominent role, a standardized scale to measure its specific influence on treatment behavior among chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients is still lacking. Therefore, this study aimed to develop a social influence scale to assess its role in patients' treatment decision-making. Patients and Methods: The scale was developed through four steps. First, a preliminary scale was developed based on the literature review and internal discussion. Second, two rounds of Delphi expert consultation were conducted for item content validation. Third, a cross-sectional survey involving 611 participants was conducted from March to October 2023 in Fuqing, China, to test the reliability and validity of the preliminary scale. Finally, the scale was assessed by item analysis, internal consistency tests, and exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. Results: The final scale consisted of five dimensions and 16 items that explained 90.5% of the total variance. Confirmative factor analysis model showed that the 5-factor model fits the data well (χ Conclusion: The scale is valid and reliable to evaluate the impact of social influence on treatment behaviors among CHB patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.