Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42633388›Full record

ReviewEuropean journal of radiology open2026

MRI fat suppression techniques in traumatic and entrapment-related brachial plexus conditions: A scoping review.

Brian O Molokwu, Rohan I Suresh, Benjamin J Park, Spencer C Moore, Dhiraj R Sibala, Alice Chu, Aleksandra M McGrath, Pawel Szaro

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European journal of radiology open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Brian O MolokwuDepartment of Orthopaedics, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ, United States.
Rohan I SureshDepartment of Orthopaedics, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ, United States.
Benjamin J ParkDepartment of Orthopaedics, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ, United States.
Spencer C MooreDepartment of Orthopaedics, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ, United States.
Dhiraj R SibalaDepartment of Orthopaedics, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ, United States.
Alice ChuDepartment of Orthopaedics, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ, United States.
Aleksandra M McGrathDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Pawel SzaroDepartment of Radiology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Traumatic and entrapment-related brachial plexus injuries are diagnostically complex conditions that often lead to substantial functional deficits. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) remains the modality of choice for preoperative evaluation, particularly when combined with fat-suppression techniques that enhance visualization of neural structures. Despite their role, the frequency and context of fat-suppression technique usage in brachial plexus imaging remain poorly defined. Methods: This scoping review aimed to systematically identify and categorize fat-suppression methods reported in MRI protocols for traumatic and entrapment-related brachial plexus injuries. A search of PubMed, Cochrane, CINAHL, and Web of Science was performed from inception to October 2023, following the Arksey and O'Malley methodological framework and reported in accordance with PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Studies were eligible if they described MRI protocols for mechanical brachial plexus injuries; non-mechanical etiologies (e.g., inflammatory or neoplastic conditions) were excluded. Results: Of 8647 screened records, 98 studies met inclusion criteria. Short tau inversion recovery (STIR) was the most frequently reported 2D fat suppression method (n = 37). Among 3D sequences, 3D STIR with sampling perfection with application-optimized contrasts using different flip-angle evolutions (SPACE) was most commonly reported. Most protocols utilized 1.5 Tesla MRI systems, a substantial minority employed 3 T systems. Dixon techniques were noted with increasing frequency in more recent literature. Conclusion: Our findings demonstrate sustained reporting of STIR while highlighting the increasing use of Dixon and advanced 3D sequences in recent publications. These results provide a comprehensive reference point for radiologists, suggesting areas for protocol optimization and standardization in brachial plexus pathology.

Indexed as

Brachial plexus injuriesDiagnostic imagingFat suppression techniquesMagnetic resonance imagingMyelography

Identifiers

PMID42633388
PMCPMC13499448

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.