ArticleVeterinary and animal science2026
Risk factor assessment and molecular characterization of foot-and-mouth disease virus in buffaloes in Bangladesh.
Article in Veterinary and animal science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) is a major infectious disease of cloven-hoofed animals that causes substantial economic losses. FMD in buffaloes was neglected in the surveillance program, therefore, this study aimed to identify and characterize the FMD virus (FMDV) and determine its associated risk factors in buffaloes in Bangladesh. A total of 150 tissue samples were purposively collected from 16 FMD-suspected buffalo farms, representing a study population of 501 buffaloes across three areas of Bangladesh. The samples were analyzed for FMDV and further tested for the serotypes (O, A, Asia 1) by RT-PCR test. The VP1 gene was sequenced and phylogenetic trees were studied. Epidemiological data were collected through a structured questionnaire. Logistic regression models were used to identify outbreak-associated risk factors. Overall, 29.94% (150/501) FMD prevalence and three serotypes, include O (n = 19), A (n = 7), and Asia 1(n = 4), were identified by RT-PCR. The case fatality, attack, and mortality rates of buffalo calves were 32.91%, 63.2%, and 20.8%, respectively. Potential risk factors identified for FMD in buffaloes including age (calves; AOR:14.07, 95%CI:6.37-31.07), grazing with cattle (yes; AOR:19.09, 95%CI:4.49-81.18), deworming practices (No, AOR:8.71, 95%CI:2.20-34.51), isolation shed (No; AOR:5.82, 95%CI:1.41-23.95), and grazing area (bush; AOR:20.78, 95%CI:5.07-85.12). Phylogenetic analysis of serotype O revealed a 95% sequence similarity with recent isolates from Bhutan and Nepal, while serotype A exhibited a 99% similarity with isolates from India and Bangladesh. Therefore, implementing appropriate control strategies is essential for reducing risk factors and minimizes the occurrence and spread of FMD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.