Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42633365›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of nursing studies advances2026

The cognitive work of acute care nurses: A hybrid model concept analysis.

Ellen Benjamin, Joanne Roman Jones, Shelby Mueller, Alexander Menard, Priscilla Gazarian

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of nursing studies advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ellen BenjaminDepartment of Nursing, Donna M. and Robert J. Manning College of Nursing and Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts, Boston, MA United States.
Joanne Roman JonesDepartment of Nursing, Donna M. and Robert J. Manning College of Nursing and Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts, Boston, MA United States.
Shelby MuellerDepartment of Nursing, Donna M. and Robert J. Manning College of Nursing and Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts, Boston, MA United States.
Alexander MenardTan Chingfen Graduate School of Nursing, University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School, Worcester, MA United States.
Priscilla GazarianTan Chingfen Graduate School of Nursing, University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School, Worcester, MA United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Nurses have long struggled to articulate the nature of their work, especially their mental work, which is complex, hidden, and intangible. The concept "cognitive work" describes the mental labor that nurses perform. Although nurses' cognitive work is consequential to patient safety and care quality, it has lacked formal conceptual analysis. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to clarify the essential attributes and measurement of cognitive work among nurses in acute care settings. Methods: A concept analysis was conducted in adherence to the Schwartz-Barcott and Kim hybrid methodology. This study was preregistered on Open Science Framework in April 2024 (https://osf.io/fgj4w). Literature published between 2001-2024 was systematically collected from three online databases. Article screening and data extraction were conducted in Covidence using a standardized extraction tool. A total of 23 articles met inclusion criteria. During the fieldwork phase, eight observations were conducted on a critical care unit in a large, academic medical center. Data were collected using field notes and a structured qualitative data collection tool. Theoretical and fieldwork analyses included the use of inductive and deductive codes, which were clustered into emergent categories. In the final analysis phase, all findings were integrated into a final conceptual definition. Results: Nursing cognitive work is a concept that is rising in use across interdisciplinary scholarship. Nurses' cognitive work is shaped and constrained by personal, environmental, organizational, and technological factors, and encompasses thinking across multiple dimensions to support clinical work, care orchestration, and relational work. Results highlight the breadth and complexity of nurses' cognitive work, which includes absorbing and interpreting information, reasoning and forming clinical judgements, managing attention and multiple demands, problem-solving, prospective thinking, and accumulating knowledge over time. Conclusion: Nursing cognitive work arises from nurses' existing knowledge, available information, and cognitive capacity. It is characterized by complex, nonlinear, dynamic, and multidimensional cognitive processes. Cognitive work has consequences for the development of nursing knowledge and expertise, nurses' mental strain and emotional exhaustion, and nurses' ability to provide safe, high-quality, efficient care, and support a positive working environment. The concept "cognitive work" is well-suited to reflect the breadth and complexity of nurse thinking, and it can be formally analyzed using a variety of measurement approaches. This definition may support future advances in nursing theory, research, and practice.

Indexed as

Clinical judgmentCognitive WorkConcept AnalysisCritical thinkingDecision MakingHybrid ModelNursing

Identifiers

PMID42633365
PMCPMC13499381

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.