ArticleADMET & DMPK2026
Experimentally derived biomimetic chromatographic descriptors for drug-induced phospholipidosis liability prediction.
Article in ADMET & DMPK, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and purpose: Drug-induced phospholipidosis (PLD) is a complex intracellular liability commonly associated with the lysosomal accumulation of cationic amphiphilic drugs and remains an important concern in drug development because of its implications for safety, intracellular disposition, and compound prioritization. Although cationic amphiphilicity, membrane interactions, and lysosomal trapping are established features of PLD, experimentally accessible descriptors that capture PLD-relevant membrane affinity remain valuable for early-stage risk assessment. This study aimed to evaluate whether biomimetic chromatographic descriptors can improve the prediction and interpretation of PLD liability by providing experimentally derived information on membrane affinity and protein-binding-related distributional behavior. Experimental approach: A curated dataset of 65 compounds with experimentally reported PLD responses was analyzed using multiple linear regression and ordinal classification approaches. PLD potency was expressed as pEC₅₀, while ordinal models classified compounds into non-inducers, weak/moderate inducers, and strong inducers. Membrane affinity was quantified using immobilized artificial membrane chromatography, expressed as CHI IAM, while protein-related interactions were represented by human serum albumin affinity, log Key results: CHI IAM-containing models showed strong predictive performance for PLD potency, with external predictivity reaching Q Conclusion: Biomimetic chromatographic descriptors provide experimentally derived, mechanistically interpretable surrogates for assessing early-stage PLD liability. CHI IAM offers a practical approximation of membrane-affinity behavior relevant to lysosomal phospholipid accumulation and PLD risk. Protein-binding descriptors may provide complementary information related to distributional phenotypes, but their added value appears less consistent than that of membrane affinity. This approach extends beyond conventional lipophilicity-based QSAR by incorporating experimentally measured distribution-relevant properties and may support compound prioritization during drug discovery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.