Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42633336›Full record

ArticleCureus2026

Anaphylactic Shock Following Administration of Iodinated Computed Tomography (CT) Contrast Media: A Case Series.

Raghad Asim Abdulla Ahmed Shilla, Nissar Shaikh, Umme Nashrah, Umm E Amara

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Raghad Asim Abdulla Ahmed ShillaMedical Education, University of Medical Sciences and Technology, Khartoum, SDN.
Nissar ShaikhSurgical Intensive Care, Hamad General Hospital, Doha, QAT.
Umme NashrahMedicine, Deccan College of Medical Sciences, Hyderabad, IND.
Umm E AmaraObstetrics and Gynecology, Deccan College of Medical Sciences, Hyderabad, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anaphylactic shock is a severe and life-threatening allergic reaction that can result from contrast agents used in imaging procedures. Iodinated contrast media (ICM) are indispensable in diagnostic computed tomography (CT), yet they carry a small but serious risk of anaphylactic reactions. Even with low-osmolar, nonionic agents such as iohexol, severe hypersensitivity can occur unpredictably, including in patients with no prior history of allergic reactions. We report a retrospective case series of three patients who experienced anaphylactic shock following administration of ICM during CT imaging at Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar. Cases were identified through clinical incident reporting and radiology department records. Anaphylaxis was diagnosed according to clinical criteria, requiring an acute onset of symptoms involving compromise of two or more organ systems such as cardiovascular, respiratory, or cutaneous, following intravenous (IV) contrast media exposure. Patient data were extracted from electronic medical records, including clinical notes, nursing observations, laboratory investigations, and imaging reports. Informed consent was obtained from patients, and the report was compiled in accordance with institutional ethical guidelines. Cases 1 and 3 involved female patients with breast cancer receiving iohexol for oncological staging. Case 2 included a male patient with multiple comorbidities who received iodixanol for cardiac evaluation. In all three cases, anaphylaxis developed shortly after IV contrast administration and was successfully managed with epinephrine, corticosteroids, antihistamines, and IV fluid administration. All patients achieved full recovery without long-term complications. These cases underscore the unpredictable nature of contrast-induced anaphylaxis and the critical importance of preprocedural risk assessment, emergency preparedness, and rapid administration of treatment. Even patients without identifiable risk factors may develop life-threatening reactions, emphasizing that all contrast-administering settings must maintain robust emergency protocols.

Indexed as

anaphylactic shockcontrast-enhanced cthypersensitivity reactioniodinated contrast mediaiohexol

Identifiers

PMID42633336
PMCPMC13499434

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.