ReviewADMET & DMPK2026
Magnetoreceptive CRY/MagR complexes: linking circadian redox signalling to protein aggregation in Alzheimer's and Parkinson's disease.
Review in ADMET & DMPK, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and purpose: Neurodegenerative disorders such as Alzheimer's disease (AD) and Parkinson's disease (PD) pose an escalating challenge to neuroscience, as disease-modifying therapies remain elusive despite substantial advances in molecular and cellular understanding. These disorders share convergent pathological features, including protein misfolding and aggregation, mitochondrial dysfunction, oxidative stress, impaired proteostasis, and disruption of circadian regulation. Identifying integrative frameworks that connect these processes is therefore essential for advancing conceptual models of neurodegeneration. This review examines magneto-proteins, with a particular focus on CRY/MagR-based magnetoreceptor complexes, as emerging biological systems that may intersect with key molecular pathways implicated in AD and PD. Experimental approach: We synthesized literature from neuroscience, biophysics, and circadian biology to evaluate the potential relevance of magnetoreceptor mechanisms to AD and PD pathology. We first summarized the core neuropathological mechanisms underlying both diseases, including amyloid-β and tau pathology in AD and α-synuclein aggregation and dopaminergic vulnerability in PD. We then outlined the biophysical foundations of magneto-protein function, emphasizing cryptochrome-mediated radical pair mechanisms, iron-sulphur cluster-dependent magnetic sensitivity, and their established roles in redox signalling and circadian biology. Key results: Accumulating experimental evidence from cellular and animal models suggests that CRY/MagR-associated pathways can modulate oxidative stress, mitochondrial bioenergetics, protein aggregation dynamics, autophagic processes, and circadian control of neuronal metabolism. These processes closely overlap with molecular determinants of neuronal vulnerability in AD and PD. However, direct validation in mammalian and human systems remains limited and controversial, representing a critical knowledge gap. Conclusion: The mechanistic convergence between magnetoreceptor biology and neurodegenerative pathology warrants critical evaluation but remains largely speculative in humans. By integrating findings across disciplines, this review positions CRY/MagR-based magneto-proteins as a conceptual platform for exploring how magnetic field-responsive molecular systems may inform our understanding of neurodegenerative disease mechanisms, while emphasizing the need for rigorous mammalian validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.