ArticleInfection and drug resistance2026
Preoperative Fibrinogen-to-Prealbumin Ratio and in-Hospital Postoperative Pneumonia After Minimally Invasive McKeown Esophagectomy for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Retrospective Cohort Study with Infection Phenotype Profiling.
Article in Infection and drug resistance, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Postoperative pneumonia (PP) after esophagectomy arises from interacting pulmonary, aspiration, airway-protection, perioperative-care, and host-response pathways. Whether the preoperative fibrinogen-to-prealbumin ratio (FPR), a marker integrating inflammatory-coagulative activity and nutritional-inflammatory reserve, is associated with in-hospital PP after minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy remains uncertain. Methods: Using routinely collected electronic medical-record data, consecutive patients with pathologically confirmed esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) who underwent elective minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy from January 2023 to December 2025 were retrospectively analyzed. FPR was expressed on the ×1000 scale and analyzed continuously per 1-unit and per 1-standard-deviation (SD) increase. The primary endpoint was in-hospital PP. Sequential multivariable logistic regression, restricted cubic splines, infection-phenotype and microbiological description, multicollinearity diagnostics, and clinically defined sensitivity analyses were performed. A complete-case 30-day PP analysis was included as a sensitivity analysis. Selectively performed airway and swallowing assessments were analyzed descriptively only. Results: Among 437 patients, 139 (31.8%) developed in-hospital PP. In the primary fully adjusted clinical model, each 1-unit increase in FPR ×1000 was associated with higher odds of PP (odds ratio [OR] 1.32, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.23-1.41; P<0.001); the OR per 1-SD increase was 4.40 (95% CI 3.09-6.29; P<0.001). Restricted cubic spline analysis supported an overall graded association (P for overall <0.001; P for non-linearity=0.162). Results remained consistent in the complete-case 30-day analysis and other sensitivity analyses. Median PP onset was postoperative day 5; 25.2% of cases were classified as aspiration-likely, and 44.7% of cultured cases were culture positive. Conclusion: Higher preoperative FPR was associated with in-hospital PP after minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy for ESCC. These single-center retrospective findings are hypothesis-generating and do not establish causality or immediate clinical utility. Prospective multicenter and external validation is required before FPR is used for perioperative risk stratification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.