Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42633308›Full record

ArticleNational science review2026

Toward a unified data-driven turbulence model through multi-objective learning.

Zhuoran Liu, Haochen Wang, Zhuolin Zhao, Heng Xiao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in National science review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Zhuoran LiuStuttgart Center for Simulation Science, University of Stuttgart, Stuttgart 70569, Germany.
Haochen WangStuttgart Center for Simulation Science, University of Stuttgart, Stuttgart 70569, Germany.
Zhuolin ZhaoStuttgart Center for Simulation Science, University of Stuttgart, Stuttgart 70569, Germany.
Heng XiaoStuttgart Center for Simulation Science, University of Stuttgart, Stuttgart 70569, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Turbulence remains one of the last unresolved problems of classical physics and a major bottleneck to accurate flow prediction in climate, aerospace, and energy systems. Industrial simulations therefore rely on averaged representations of turbulence, which often struggle to predict flows governed by multiple interacting mechanisms. We present a unified, data-driven turbulence modeling framework designed to learn robustly from sparse, indirect observations across diverse flow regimes. The framework embeds physical consistency into a flexible, frame-invariant closure, automatically selects representative training cases based on similarity of flow-feature distributions, and learns a single, unified model through a multi-objective ensemble strategy that balances competing objectives across flows and quantities of interest. The resulting unified foundation model adapts seamlessly across regimes without manual intervention. It outperforms existing turbulence models across a broad spectrum of canonical flows and maintains improved performance in complex three-dimensional configurations of industrial relevance, including a gas turbine diffuser, a generic car, and a generic aircraft. When application-specific accuracy is required, the framework further enables specialist models through additive fine-tuning on targeted flow datasets. The results demonstrate the feasibility of a deployable and generalized turbulence modeling approach that unifies multiple flow mechanisms within a single architecture for a broad range of natural and industrial flows.

Indexed as

multi-objective learningReynolds-averaged Navier–Stokesunified turbulence model

Identifiers

PMID42633308
PMCPMC13499236

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.