ArticleCureus2026
Dupilumab-Induced Vitiligo Managed Effectively With Nemolizumab and Targeted Topical Therapy.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Dupilumab, a monoclonal antibody targeting the IL-4 and IL-13 pathways, has revolutionized the treatment of moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD). However, emerging evidence suggests rare immune-mediated adverse events, including vitiligo onset or exacerbation. The pathogenesis involves potential immune dysregulation and cytokine imbalance following IL-4/IL-13 inhibition. To report a case of dupilumab-induced vitiligo in a patient with AD and evaluate the therapeutic alternatives for management, we present a case report of a 57-year-old woman with longstanding AD who developed new-onset vitiligo following dupilumab therapy. The patient was subsequently switched to nemolizumab, an IL-31 receptor antagonist, and treated with topical tacrolimus 0.1% ointment on one hand and ruxolitinib cream on the contralateral hand to compare treatment efficacy. Three months after dupilumab initiation, the patient developed depigmented patches on bilateral metacarpophalangeal joints consistent with non-segmental vitiligo, with no prior history of vitiligo or autoimmune disease. Following transition to nemolizumab and topical treatments, significant improvement occurred within eight weeks. The hand treated with ruxolitinib demonstrated superior repigmentation compared to the tacrolimus-treated hand. This case highlights dupilumab's potential to induce vitiligo through Th2 cytokine inhibition and subsequent Th1/Th17 activation, promoting melanocyte destruction. The superior efficacy of topical JAK-STAT inhibition with ruxolitinib compared to tacrolimus suggests JAK pathway modulation may be more effective for managing biologic-induced pigmentary disorders. Clinicians should monitor for the development of vitiligo in dupilumab-treated patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.