ReviewEuropean journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology: X2026
Transradial access in interventional gynecology and obstetrics: Current evidence, clinical applications, and future directions.
Review in European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology: X, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Transradial access (TRA) has emerged as a transformative approach in interventional cardiology and is increasingly being adopted in peripheral vascular interventions, including gynecological and obstetric procedures. Traditionally performed via transfemoral access (TFA), uterine artery embolization (UAE) and other pelvic interventions require prolonged bed rest and carry inherent access-site complications. This review synthesizes current evidence on the feasibility, safety, and clinical efficacy of TRA in interventional gynecology and obstetrics, covering UAE for fibroids, management of obstetric and gynecological hemorrhage, technical considerations, and future directions. A comprehensive literature search was performed in PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library for studies published up to 2025. Meta-analyses demonstrate that TRA is a safe and effective alternative to TFA for UAE, with advantages including reduced radiation exposure (MD -207.54 mGy), shorter procedure times (MD -7.38 min), and higher likelihood of same-day discharge (RR 9.50). In obstetric and gynecological hemorrhage, cohort data support comparable efficacy with improved patient quality of life. A ten-year single-center experience reported a 97.35% angiographic success rate and a 7% mild complication rate. TRA offers particular advantages in obstetric patients, including immediate ambulation, reduced radiation exposure, and preserved fertility. However, the steeper learning curve, risk of radial artery occlusion, and limited long-term data remain challenges. Wider adoption requires structured training programs and further prospective studies. TRA represents a promising paradigm shift in interventional gynecology and obstetrics, offering comparable efficacy to TFA with potential advantages in radiation reduction, faster recovery, and improved patient comfort.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.