Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42633258›Full record

ArticleCritical care and resuscitation : journal of the Australasian Academy of Critical Care Medicine2026

Evaluation of the SMS-ICU score for multicontinental use: A federated external validation study using critical care registry data.

Alexander Tracy, Fathima Fazla, Jorge I F Salluh, Rashan Haniffa, Rabiul Alam Md Erfan Uddin, Diptesh Aryal, Sylvia Brinkman, Gastón Burghi, Zakary Doherty, Dave Dongelmans and 14 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Critical care and resuscitation : journal of the Australasian Academy of Critical Care Medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors.

Alexander TracyUsher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Fathima FazlaNational Intensive Care Surveillance-MORU, Colombo, Sri Lanka.
Jorge I F SalluhPostgraduate Program, Instituto D'Or de Pesquisa e Ensino Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Rashan HaniffaCentre for Inflammation Research, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Rabiul Alam Md Erfan UddinDepartment of Medicine, Chittagong Medical College, Chittagong, Bangladesh.
Diptesh AryalNational Intensive Care Surveillance-MORU, Colombo, Sri Lanka.
Sylvia BrinkmanNational Intensive Care Evaluation (NICE) Foundation, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Gastón BurghiIntensive Care Unit, Hospital Maciel, Montevideo, Montevideo, Uruguay.
Zakary DohertyAustralian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Dave DongelmansNational Intensive Care Evaluation (NICE) Foundation, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Stefano FinazziMario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research IRCCS, Laboratory of Clinical Data Science, Department of Medical Epidemiology, Lombardia, Italy.
Ville IhalainenDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Kuopio University Hospital, and University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.
Bharath Kumar Tirupakuzhi VijayaraghavanCentre for Inflammation Research, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Mohammed Basri Mat-NorDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, International Islamic University Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Tahlia PerumalDivision of Pulmonology, Department of Medicine, Centre for Lung Infection and Immunity, University of Cape Town Lung Institute, Cape Town, South Africa.
David PilcherThe Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care (ANZICS) Centre for Outcome and Resource Evaluation, Melbourne, Australia.
Luigi PisaniDepartment of Precision-Regenerative Medicine and Jonic Area (DiMePRe-J), Section of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", Bari, Italy.
Matti ReinikainenDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Kuopio University Hospital, and University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.
Moses Siaw-FrimpongDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Komfo Anokye Teaching Hospital, Kumasi, Ghana.
Menbeu SultanDepartment of Emergency Medicine and Critical Care, St. Paul's Hospital Millennium Medical College, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
David ThomsonDepartment of Anaesthesia and Peri-operative Medicine, Division of Critical Care, University of Cape Town, Groote Schuur Hospital, Cape Town, South Africa.
Giovanni TricellaMario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research IRCCS, Laboratory of Clinical Data Science, Department of Medical Epidemiology, Lombardia, Italy.
Abigail BeaneCentre for Inflammation Research, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Otavio RanzaniDataHealth Lab, Institut de Recerca Sant Pau (IR SANT PAU), Barcelona, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the suitability of the Simplified Mortality Score for the Intensive Care Unit (SMS-ICU) for use in critical care registries across multiple continents. Design: A federated external validation study. Setting: Intensive care units (ICUs) belonging to 12 critical care registries on five continents. Participants: Individuals over the age of 18 years who were admitted to participating ICUs during the 2023 calendar year. Readmissions within the same hospital encounter and interhospital transfers were excluded. Interventions: None. Main outcome measures: The primary outcome was all-cause in-hospital mortality. A secondary analysis considered ICU mortality. Results: 12 registries participated (three from Africa, four from Asia, one from Oceania, two from Europe and two from South America). In total, 494,705 admissions were included from 546 ICUs in 13 countries. Seven registries systematically reported hospital outcomes and were included in the primary analysis. Discrimination was acceptable (pooled area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUROC] 0.76 [95% CI 0.72-0.80]). Calibration and overall model fit varied between registries (Brier scores 0.09-0.14). In the secondary analysis of ICU outcomes in all 12 registries, discrimination remained acceptable but with higher variation between registries (pooled AUROC 0.73 [0.69-0.77]). Calibration and overall model fit also varied widely (Brier scores 0.07-0.46). Conclusions: SMS-ICU may be used as an index of illness severity in international intensive care populations. This may facilitate international collaborative research and synthesis of findings in systematic reviews and meta-analyses.

Indexed as

Global healthIntensive careMortalityPrognosisRegistriesSeverity of illnessSeverity of illness index

Identifiers

PMID42633258
PMCPMC13499179

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.