ArticleCritical care and resuscitation : journal of the Australasian Academy of Critical Care Medicine2026
Evaluation of the SMS-ICU score for multicontinental use: A federated external validation study using critical care registry data.
Article in Critical care and resuscitation : journal of the Australasian Academy of Critical Care Medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
24 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the suitability of the Simplified Mortality Score for the Intensive Care Unit (SMS-ICU) for use in critical care registries across multiple continents. Design: A federated external validation study. Setting: Intensive care units (ICUs) belonging to 12 critical care registries on five continents. Participants: Individuals over the age of 18 years who were admitted to participating ICUs during the 2023 calendar year. Readmissions within the same hospital encounter and interhospital transfers were excluded. Interventions: None. Main outcome measures: The primary outcome was all-cause in-hospital mortality. A secondary analysis considered ICU mortality. Results: 12 registries participated (three from Africa, four from Asia, one from Oceania, two from Europe and two from South America). In total, 494,705 admissions were included from 546 ICUs in 13 countries. Seven registries systematically reported hospital outcomes and were included in the primary analysis. Discrimination was acceptable (pooled area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUROC] 0.76 [95% CI 0.72-0.80]). Calibration and overall model fit varied between registries (Brier scores 0.09-0.14). In the secondary analysis of ICU outcomes in all 12 registries, discrimination remained acceptable but with higher variation between registries (pooled AUROC 0.73 [0.69-0.77]). Calibration and overall model fit also varied widely (Brier scores 0.07-0.46). Conclusions: SMS-ICU may be used as an index of illness severity in international intensive care populations. This may facilitate international collaborative research and synthesis of findings in systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.