ArticleJSES reviews, reports, and techniques2026
Zero confirmed allergic reactions to cefazolin in an elective orthopedic cohort with high prevalence of reported beta-lactam allergies.
Article in JSES reviews, reports, and techniques, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Cefazolin is the most effective prophylactic antibiotic for orthopedic surgeries. There is a high prevalence of patient-reported beta-lactam antibiotic allergies, which often results in inferior pre-operative antibiotics use. This study's purpose was to determine the rate of true allergic reactions among patients with a reported beta-lactam allergy when administered cefazolin. The hypothesis was that the rate of true allergic reactions would be low following cefazolin administration among patients with reported beta-lactam allergy. Methods: Patients undergoing orthopedic surgical procedures by a single surgeon between January 2023 and December 2024 were included. Reported autoimmune/psychiatric disorders, total number of reported allergies, type of reported beta-lactam antibiotic allergy, reported symptoms to beta-lactam antibiotic, and reported allergy severity were obtained via electronic medical records. Allergies were categorized as "true allergies" (anaphylactic/non-anaphylactic) or "other reactions." Demographic and allergy characteristics were compared between patients who did and did not report a beta-lactam antibiotic allergy. Results: Of 1,603 patients (57 ± 18 years; 47% female), 310 (19%) patients reported a beta-lactam antibiotic allergy and 230/310 (74%) specifically reported a penicillin allergy. Female (61% vs. 44%, Conclusion: Zero patients with a reported beta-lactam antibiotic allergy were found to have a true allergic reaction during the intraoperative or immediate post-operative period following cefazolin administration during an orthopedic surgery. Although reported allergies should be critically evaluated, this suggests cefazolin may be safely administered even if a beta-lactam antibiotic allergy is reported.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.