Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42633209›Full record

ArticleJournal of bone oncology2026

Skeletal metastatic burden as a strong prognostic factor of survival in advanced NSCLC treated with chemo-immunotherapy: An exploratory imaging-based analysis.

Mariam Grazia Polito, Consolo Andrea, Cariglia Marcello, Simone Foderaro, Marco Russano, Alessia Vendittelli, Giulia La Cava, Emanuele Claudio Mingo, Matteo Fiorenti, Ludovica Esposito and 13 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of bone oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors.

Mariam Grazia PolitoDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Via Alvaro del Portillo 200, 00128 Roma, Italy.
Consolo AndreaDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Via Alvaro del Portillo 200, 00128 Roma, Italy.
Cariglia MarcelloDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Via Alvaro del Portillo 200, 00128 Roma, Italy.
Simone FoderaroDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Via Alvaro del Portillo 200, 00128 Roma, Italy.
Marco RussanoDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Via Alvaro del Portillo 200, 00128 Roma, Italy.
Alessia VendittelliDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Via Alvaro del Portillo 200, 00128 Roma, Italy.
Giulia La CavaDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Via Alvaro del Portillo 200, 00128 Roma, Italy.
Emanuele Claudio MingoDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Via Alvaro del Portillo 200, 00128 Roma, Italy.
Matteo FiorentiDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Via Alvaro del Portillo 200, 00128 Roma, Italy.
Ludovica EspositoDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Via Alvaro del Portillo 200, 00128 Roma, Italy.
Cecilia Teresa SaracinoDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Via Alvaro del Portillo 200, 00128 Roma, Italy.
Federica GiaccioDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Via Alvaro del Portillo 200, 00128 Roma, Italy.
Federica BernieriDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Via Alvaro del Portillo 200, 00128 Roma, Italy.
Camilla LandoneDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Via Alvaro del Portillo 200, 00128 Roma, Italy.
Beatrice De SantisDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Via Alvaro del Portillo 200, 00128 Roma, Italy.
Vittoria ColellaDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Via Alvaro del Portillo 200, 00128 Roma, Italy.
Luisana SiscaDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Via Alvaro del Portillo 200, 00128 Roma, Italy.
Francesco PantanoDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Via Alvaro del Portillo 200, 00128 Roma, Italy.
Bruno VincenziDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Via Alvaro del Portillo 200, 00128 Roma, Italy.
Giuseppe ToniniDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Via Alvaro del Portillo 200, 00128 Roma, Italy.
Bruno Beomonte ZobelDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Via Alvaro del Portillo 200, 00128 Roma, Italy.
Alessio CortelliniDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Via Alvaro del Portillo 200, 00128 Roma, Italy.
Carlo Augusto MallioDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Via Alvaro del Portillo 200, 00128 Roma, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Metastatic burden is a key determinant of prognosis in advanced solid tumors, yet current RECIST 1.1-based assessment does not fully capture total or site-specific disease extent. Emerging evidence suggests that quantitative imaging-derived metrics may improve prognostic stratification beyond binary metastatic classification. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 52 patients with advanced non-oncogene-addicted lung cancer. Baseline clinical variables and imaging-derived metastatic lesions were assessed across multiple organ sites (lung, lymph nodes, bone, brain, liver and adrenal glands). Lesion area was calculated using an elliptical approximation and summed per organ and globally. Overall survival was evaluated using multivariable Cox regression models with restricted cubic splines to account for non-linear effects. Analyses included: binary metastatic status, continuous site-specific tumor burden, and relative contribution of each site to total metastatic load. Results: Median age was 67 years, and bone (53%) and brain (27%) were frequent metastatic sites. Across all analytical levels, bone metastases consistently showed the strongest prognostic impact. Bone involvement was associated with worse overall survival both as a binary variable (HR 2.93, Conclusion: Quantitative assessment of metastatic burden identified skeletal disease as a consistent prognostic signal in this exploratory cohort, supporting further investigation of imaging-derived measures of metastatic burden and spatial disease distribution.

Identifiers

PMID42633209
PMCPMC13499348

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.