Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42633207›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics advances2026

seqme: a Python library for evaluating biological sequence design from generative models.

Rasmus Møller-Larsen, Adam Izdebski, Jan Olszewski, Pankhil Gawade, Michal Kmicikiewicz, Wojciech Zarzecki, Ewa Szczurek

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Rasmus Møller-LarsenInstitute of AI for Health, Helmholtz Munich, Neuherberg 85764, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-8212-9333
Adam IzdebskiInstitute of AI for Health, Helmholtz Munich, Neuherberg 85764, Germany.
Jan OlszewskiFaculty of Mathematics, Informatics and Mechanics, University of Warsaw, Warszawa 02-097, Poland.
Pankhil GawadeInstitute of AI for Health, Helmholtz Munich, Neuherberg 85764, Germany.
Michal KmicikiewiczInstitute of AI for Health, Helmholtz Munich, Neuherberg 85764, Germany.
Wojciech ZarzeckiFaculty of Mathematics, Informatics and Mechanics, University of Warsaw, Warszawa 02-097, Poland.
Ewa SzczurekInstitute of AI for Health, Helmholtz Munich, Neuherberg 85764, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1320-6695

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Summary: Recent advances in computational methods for designing biological sequences have sparked the development of metrics to evaluate these methods performance in terms of the fidelity of the designed sequences to a target distribution and their attainment of desired properties. However, a software library implementing these metrics was lacking. In this work we introduce seqme, a modular and highly extendable open-source Python library, containing model-agnostic metrics for evaluating computational methods for biological sequence design. seqme considers three groups of metrics: sequence-based, embedding-based, and property-based, and is applicable to a wide range of biological sequences: small molecules, DNA, ncRNA, mRNA, peptides and proteins. The library offers a number of embedding and property models for biological sequences, as well as diagnostics and visualization functions to inspect the results. seqme can be used to evaluate both one-shot generation and iterative optimization. We show the utility of seqme by performing an antimicrobial peptide benchmark and acquiring mRNA data. Availability and implementation: seqme is released at https://github.com/szczurek-lab/seqme under the BSD 3-Clause license.

Identifiers

PMID42633207
PMCPMC13499220

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.