Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42633139›Full record

ReviewIBRO neuroscience reports2026

NF-κB across the Alzheimer disease spectrum: Context-dependent protective and pathogenic roles.

Ali Azargoonjahromi, Fatemeh Abutalebian, Hamide Nasiri

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in IBRO neuroscience reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ali AzargoonjahromiShiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Fatemeh AbutalebianDepartment of Biotechnology and Medicine, Islamic Azad University of Tehran Central Branch, Tehran, Iran.
Hamide NasiriStudent Research Committee, School of Medicine, Zanjan University of Medical Science, Zanjan, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB) has been implicated in both protective and detrimental processes in Alzheimer disease (AD), creating an apparent contradiction in the literature. Increasing evidence, however, indicates that these divergent effects reflect differences in cell type, molecular configuration, activation kinetics, disease state, and the surrounding pathological environment rather than a true biological paradox. Under transient and tightly regulated conditions, NF-κB can support neuronal survival, stress adaptation, antioxidant defense, and selected compensatory responses to amyloid-β pathology. In contrast, persistent or disease-conditioned signaling is more consistently associated with amyloidogenic processing, tau propagation, chronic neuroinflammation, impaired proteostasis, neuronal dysfunction, and neurovascular injury. The available evidence therefore supports an asymmetric framework in which protective effects are confined to relatively specific molecular and temporal settings, whereas sustained pathological signaling is supported across a broader range of disease-relevant models and cellular processes. This distinction argues against indiscriminate activation or global inhibition of NF-κB, either of which could disrupt physiological functions while failing to selectively suppress disease-driving pathways. Therapeutic strategies should instead target defined pathological NF-κB programs within the relevant cell type and disease context while preserving adaptive and homeostatic signaling. This review synthesizes the context-dependent roles of NF-κB in AD and provides a framework for reconciling its apparently opposing effects.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseAmyloid-βNeuroinflammationNeuroprotectionNF-κB

Identifiers

PMID42633139
PMCPMC13499065

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.