ArticleOxford medical case reports2026
Melphalan-induced serpentine supravenous hyperpigmentation with associated venous thrombosis.
Article in Oxford medical case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Serpentine supravenous hyperpigmentation (SSH) is a rare cutaneous adverse reaction characterized by linear hyperpigmentation along superficial veins following intravenous drug administration, most commonly chemotherapy. We report a rare case of melphalan-induced SSH complicated by superficial venous thrombosis. A 54-year-old man treated for kappa light-chain multiple myeloma developed asymptomatic serpiginous hyperpigmented lesions along the superficial venous network one day after peripheral intravenous melphalan infusion prior to autologous stem cell transplantation. Ten days later, the lesions became painful, and Doppler ultrasound revealed thrombosis of the involved superficial veins. The patient was successfully treated with oral anticoagulation and local care. SSH is generally considered benign and self-limited; however, painful lesions should prompt evaluation for vascular complications such as thrombosis. This case expands the spectrum of chemotherapeutic agents associated with SSH and highlights the importance of early recognition of atypical presentations and complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.