ArticleWomen's health reports (New Rochelle, N.Y.)
Improving Maternal Vaccination: Analysis of Formative Interviews with Prenatal Health Care Providers.
Article in Women's health reports (New Rochelle, N.Y.). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Maternal vaccination rates are low in the United States. Understanding barriers to vaccination for pregnant women from the provider's perspective can help better address these issues. This exploratory study assesses participating prenatal health care providers' beliefs and perspectives regarding maternal vaccination for Tdap, flu, COVID-19, and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) vaccines. Methods: This qualitative study included 24 virtual in-depth interviews with prenatal health care providers (12 physicians, 12 certified nurse midwives) working in rural and urban areas. Thematic analysis was conducted to identify perceived barriers and challenges to prenatal care, provider perceptions and recommendations on Tdap, flu, COVID-19, and RSV vaccines, vaccination resources shared with pregnant women, and vaccine administration practices. Results: Most providers reported pregnant women were receptive to vaccination when benefits and risks of prenatal vaccination were explained. Rural providers identified barriers to care that included limited transportation, lack of access to health care, and language barriers. Findings also indicate prenatal health care providers can foster trust, engage in two-way conversations, and navigate patients' cultural influences when addressing vaccination challenges. Conclusion: Provider communication about maternal vaccination should be grounded in an evidence-based, participatory approach. Building trust, recognizing and addressing cultural barriers and access challenges are key to identifying practical steps to support access to and uptake of maternal vaccinations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.