ArticleCase reports in urology2026
Concurrent Management of Prostate Cancer and Perianal Fistula: A Case Report, Treatment Considerations, and Review of Literature.
Article in Case reports in urology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Concurrent Management of Prostate Cancer and Perianal Fistula: A Case Report, Treatment Considerations, and Review of Literature.Case reports in urology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Prostate cancer and pre-existing perianal fistula are challenging conditions to manage concurrently as pelvic radiotherapy may raise concern for impaired wound healing, infection, or fistula progression. Although radiotherapy has traditionally raised concern as a risk factor for fistulization, this case suggests that selected patients with a pre-existing perianal fistula may be treated with careful multidisciplinary planning and modern radiotherapy techniques. Case Presentation: A 70-year-old male diagnosed with favorable intermediate-risk prostate cancer and a concurrent perianal fistula was treated with definitive radiation therapy and staged surgical treatment, respectively. The patient underwent intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) with daily image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT), receiving a total dose of 70 Gy in 28 fractions while minimizing radiation dose to the perianal region. Prior to radiation, a seton was placed to facilitate drainage and reduce infection risk from the fistula. Following radiotherapy, the patient underwent successful surgical fistulectomy without complications. At 26 months posttreatment, the patient remains free of biochemical recurrence and without recurrence of the perianal fistula. Conclusions: This case highlights the clinical importance of applying and coordinating established management principles to an uncommon and challenging scenario. Although seton placement, IMRT/IGRT, and fistula surgery are individually well-established approaches, their sequencing in the setting of localized prostate cancer with a concurrent pre-existing perianal fistula remains poorly described. This report offers a practical example of individualized, staged management in a complex clinical scenario for which standardized treatment pathways remain limited.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.