ArticleClinical kidney journal2026
Delayed kidney response in AL amyloidosis: prevalence and clinical significance.
Article in Clinical kidney journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Kidney involvement is frequent in AL amyloidosis and significantly impacts prognosis. Although hematologic response is the recommended marker for monitoring treatment efficacy, organ-specific responses are frequently evaluated in clinical practice. In this context, the significance and optimal timing of kidney-specific response remain poorly defined in the literature. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study of patients with renal AL amyloidosis treated with or without anti-clonal therapy (ACT). Kidney response rates and their timing were analyzed. Patients were stratified by time to kidney response: very early (0-6 months), early (6-12 months), and late (>12 months). Baseline characteristics, treatments, and outcomes were compared across groups. Results: Seventy-six patients were included; 58 received ACT. Among them, 59% achieved hematologic response and 52% achieved kidney response. Kidney response was associated with improved kidney survival. Median time to hematologic response was 4.58 (1-9.38) months, whereas median time to partial and complete kidney response were 9 (6-18) and 16.5 (9-25) months ( Conclusion: Kidney response in AL amyloidosis occurs later than hematologic response but is associated with favorable kidney outcomes. In our study, delayed kidney response was associated with longer treatment duration despite hematologic response. Prospective studies are needed to determine whether treatment decisions based on kidney response alone improve or worsen patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.