Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42632900›Full record

ArticleChiropractic & manual therapies2026

Development of national consensus-based recommendations for history taking, examination and clinical management of infants in chiropractic practice.

Freja Gomez Overgaard, Lise Hestbæk, Elisabeth Davidson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Chiropractic & manual therapies, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Freja Gomez OvergaardMedical Spinal Research Unit, Spine Centre of Southern Denmark, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Sygehusvej 24, 6000, Kolding, Denmark. Freja.gomez.overgaard@rsyd.dk.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-0367-0823
Lise HestbækCenter for Muscle and Joint Health, Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Elisabeth DavidsonKiropraxis, Private, Private Chiropractic Pratice, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChiropractors in many countries provide care for infants, yet few structured, evidence-informed recommendations exist to guide history taking, examination, and clinical management in this population. In Denmark, variation in practice and limited public understanding of chiropractic care for infants highlighted the need for national recommendations to support safe, consistent, and transparent care.

objectiveTo describe the development of national recommendations outlining the minimum requirements for history taking, examination, and clinical management considerations for infants aged 0-12 months in chiropractic practice.

methodsThese recommendations were commissioned by the Danish Society of Chiropractic and initially developed in 2020, with an update in 2025. The manuscript was reported with consideration of the RIGHT Statement. Recommendation development was informed by a targeted literature review, a national knowledge-sharing workshop involving 71 chiropractors, expert review by a seven-member panel with extensive paediatric experience, and external stakeholder consultation. Feedback from each stage was incorporated through an iterative drafting process.

resultsThe recommendations describe minimum requirements for medical history taking, red flag screening, general and musculoskeletal examination, referral, and clinical management considerations for infants. Minimum and supplementary assessment components are presented in structured tables to support consistent clinical assessment and decision-making.

conclusionsThese national recommendations establish minimum requirements for history taking, examination, and clinical management considerations for infants in chiropractic practice. Developed through a structured process integrating a targeted literature review, practice-based input, expert review, and stakeholder consultation, they provide a transparent and practical framework to support safe, consistent, and collaborative paediatric care. Transparent reporting of the development process may facilitate the adaptation of these recommendations and the development of similar recommendations in other healthcare settings.

Indexed as

ChiropracticManipulation, ChiropracticMedical History TakingPhysical ExaminationConsensusDenmarkHumansInfantInfant, NewbornChiropracticClinical guidelinesHistory takingInfantsManual therapyMusculoskeletal assessmentPediatricsPhysical examination

Identifiers

PMID42632900
PMCPMC13499300

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.