SynthesisWorld journal of surgical oncology2026
Erector spinae plane block (ESPB) versus paravertebral plane block (PVB) in managing post-operative pain in breast cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in World journal of surgical oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBreast cancer surgeries remain the cornerstone of treatment for early-stage disease. Nonetheless, a substantial proportion of patients experience moderate-to-severe acute or chronic postoperative pain, adversely affecting quality of life and functional recovery. Regional anesthetic techniques have emerged as effective strategies for perioperative pain control. This study compares the erector spinae plane block (ESPB) and the thoracic paravertebral block (PVB) in breast cancer surgeries.
methodsFour databases were systematically searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) using ESPB and PVB in breast cancer surgeries. Primary extracted outcomes include post-operative morphine consumption, analgesia duration, resting and dynamic pain scores. Methodological quality was assessed using the ROB-2 tool, while data were pooled using the R software, Version 4.4.2.
resultsNineteen RCTs reporting on 1527 patients were included. Postoperative morphine consumption, PONV incidence, and intraoperative fentanyl use were comparable in both groups. Similarly, pain scores at rest and movement reported no significant differences. The two techniques also demonstrated similar results regarding the number of patients requiring rescue analgesia and analgesia duration. ESPB was associated with a significant, however clinically negligent, shorter surgery duration compared to PVB [MD -0.04, 95% CI; -0.07 to 0.00, P = 0.023].
conclusionESPB and PVB provide comparable analgesic efficacy and perioperative outcomes in breast cancer surgeries. ESPB may offer a shorter surgical duration, supporting its use as a simpler yet equally effective alternative to PVB, however this must be taken cautiously.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.