ArticleClinical rheumatology2026
Remnant cholesterol inflammation index (RCII) as a potential biomarker for ACPA-negative rheumatoid arthritis: evidence from dual-cohort analysis and serum lipidomics.
Article in Clinical rheumatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionCompared with anti-citrullinated protein autoantibody (ACPA)-positive RA, the etiology of ACPA-negative RA remains unclear, posing significant challenges to diagnosis. Recently, evidence has emerged that ACPA-negative RA is characterized by metabolic reprogramming, as well as dysregulated lipid metabolism. The remnant cholesterol inflammation index (RCII) is a comprehensive index of lipid burden and inflammation; this study evaluated the predictive value of RCII as a novel biomarker for ACPA-negative RA.
methodsIn the Beijing Hospital (BJH) cohort, we first compared RCII across various autoimmune diseases and undifferentiated inflammatory arthritis versus healthy controls (HCs). Subsequently, we assessed the independent association between RCII and ACPA-negative RA in the BJH cohort and UK Biobank (UKB) cohort using multivariable logistic regression, adjusting for confounders including age, sex, BMI, and cardiovascular comorbidities. Diagnostic performance was evaluated via receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, and optimal diagnostic RCII intervals were defined using a stratified 5-fold cross-validation framework. Furthermore, the possible underlying mechanisms were investigated using untargeted serum lipidomics in a matched subset.
resultsIn the BJH cohort, RCII levels were significantly elevated in ACPA-negative RA, ACPA-positive RA, undifferentiated inflammatory arthritis, dermatomyositis, and systemic lupus erythematosus compared with HCs, with the highest levels observed in ACPA-negative RA. Dual-cohort analysis confirmed elevated RCII in ACPA-negative RA, with independent associations (BJH: OR = 26.11; UKB: OR = 5.59) even after adjusting for age, sex, BMI, and cardiovascular disease (CVD). In the ROC analysis, RCII demonstrated relatively high diagnostic accuracy, achieving an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.929 in the BJH cohort and 0.785 in the UKB cohort. Cross-validation established stable diagnostic intervals, effectively minimizing the indeterminate decision zone, or "gray zone" to less than 10% of cases. Lipidomic profiling revealed a possible metabolic signature characterized by the broad suppression of phosphatidylcholines (PCs) and triacylglycerols (TAGs) alongside the specific upregulation of pro-inflammatory ceramides (Cers), preliminarily providing biological plausibility for the lipid-inflammation interplay reflected by RCII.
conclusionRCII served as an integrative biomarker, demonstrating improved diagnostic performance compared with isolated lipid or inflammatory measures in identifying ACPA-negative RA. By reflecting the metabolic-inflammatory burden, the interval-based RCII thresholds established in this study provided a practical tool with the potential to help address the current diagnostic gap in seronegative patients. Key Points • This dual-cohort study shows elevated RCII in ACPA-negative RA (median 3.13 vs 0.32 in BJH; 1.91 vs 0.64 in UKB, both P< 0.001) and independent associations after adjustment for age, sex, BMI, and CVD (OR 26.11 in BJH; OR 5.59 in UKB). • Stratified 5-fold cross-validation with reciprocal validation produced RCII diagnostic intervals (0.211-1.744 from BJH; 0.120-1.873 from UKB) that placed all cases in the positive interval while restricting the grey zone to 8.3-9.8% across cohorts. • Serum lipidomics in matched subsets (n = 25 per group) identified 64 differential lipids (61 downregulated, 3 upregulated), featuring reduced TAGs and PCs along with increased pro-inflammatory ceramides (e.g., Cer d18:1/18:0, FC = 1.91), preliminarily providing biological plausibility for the observed RCII elevations in ACPA-negative RA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42632872What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.