ArticleArchives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery2026
Elective arthroplasty on "high-risk" calendar dates: no evidence for worse outcomes in 43,000 procedures.
Article in Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundConcerns regarding the timing of elective surgery remain common among patients and may influence surgical scheduling. Superstition-associated calendar dates such as Friday the 13th are frequently perceived as "high-risk" time points, yet evidence regarding their impact on arthroplasty outcomes is lacking. This study investigated whether primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) performed on these dates are associated with differences in revision risk, mortality, or procedure frequency.
methodsA nationwide retrospective cohort study was conducted using Medicare physician service records (2009-2019). Primary THA and TKA procedures were identified in a 5% sample of Medicare beneficiaries aged ≥ 65 years. Outcomes included aseptic revision, septic revision, and mortality. Competing-risk survival analyses (Fine-Gray) and multivariable Cox regression models adjusted for demographic, clinical, and socioeconomic covariates were applied. Procedure volumes were compared between superstition-associated and control dates.
resultsA total of 945 arthroplasties were performed on Fridays falling on the 13th. No significant differences were observed in aseptic revision, septic revision, or mortality compared with control dates. For Friday the 13th, hazard ratios were 0.80 (95% CI 0.44-1.47) for aseptic revision, 0.83 (95% CI 0.31-2.25) for septic revision, and 1.00 (95% CI 0.83-1.19) for mortality. Procedure volumes did not differ significantly between superstition-associated and control dates.
conclusionIn this large registry-based study, the timing of elective total joint arthroplasty on superstition-associated calendar dates was not associated with increased complication risk, mortality, or changes in procedure volume. These findings may support evidence-based patient counselling and surgical scheduling in elective arthroplasty.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.