Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42632827›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of urology2026

Intrarenal antimicrobial irrigation as an adjunct to systemic prophylaxis in upper tract endourology: a PRISMA-ScR scoping review of a limited and heterogeneous evidence base.

Rubén Montero Fabuena, Esther Montero Gómez, Ainhoa Antequera Granados, Rodrigo Bianchi Stilman, Marta Goicoechea Rey, Alba Requeijo Cendán, Andrés Rodríguez Alonso

Abstract readScoping Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of urology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Rubén Montero FabuenaDepartment of Urology, Hospital Arquitecto Marcide, Ferrol, Spain. rubenmontero89@gmail.com.
Esther Montero GómezDepartment of Urology, Hospital Arquitecto Marcide, Ferrol, Spain.
Ainhoa Antequera GranadosDepartment of Urology, Hospital Arquitecto Marcide, Ferrol, Spain.
Rodrigo Bianchi StilmanDepartment of Urology, Hospital Arquitecto Marcide, Ferrol, Spain.
Marta Goicoechea ReyDepartment of Urology, Hospital Arquitecto Marcide, Ferrol, Spain.
Alba Requeijo CendánDepartment of Urology, Hospital Arquitecto Marcide, Ferrol, Spain.
Andrés Rodríguez AlonsoDepartment of Urology, Hospital Arquitecto Marcide, Ferrol, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis review maps evidence for adding antimicrobial or antiseptic agents to intrarenal irrigation during upper tract endourology and the physiological rationale linking intrarenal pressure to septic complications.

methodsFollowing PRISMA-ScR guidelines, we searched PubMed and Scopus (see Methods for dates) for clinical outcomes of antimicrobial or antiseptic irrigation during retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) or percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) in adults. Given anticipated heterogeneity, findings were synthesized narratively without meta-analysis.

resultsFour heterogeneous studies (1988-2024; N = 226) met inclusion criteria, spanning both RIRS and PCNL. Buck et al. (1988, n = 20) achieved sterile nephrostomy cultures using postoperative noxythiolin after PCNL (double-blind randomized controlled trial, RCT). Yildiz et al. (2024, n = 102) reported a borderline-significant fever/systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) reduction (composite outcome) with intraoperative gentamicin during RIRS (2.0% vs. 11.8%, p = 0.05). Kone et al. (2022, n = 48) and Rai et al. (2021, n = 56) used intraoperative povidone-iodine, alone or combined with gentamicin, against historical PCNL cohorts (fever 16.7% vs. 45.8%, p = 0.029; sepsis 3.5% vs. 8-10%, no p-value). No adverse events were reported, though ascertainment was not standardized and serum levels were not measured.

conclusionIn all four studies, adding intrarenal antimicrobial irrigation to standard systemic prophylaxis was associated with a lower rate of that study's own infectious or microbiological endpoint, with no reported harm. Differences in procedure, agent, timing, design and outcome preclude pooling, and none tested irrigation as a substitute for systemic prophylaxis. Findings are hypothesis-generating rather than practice-changing; adequately powered, concurrently controlled trials stratified by procedure and agent are needed before recommending adoption.

Indexed as

Antibiotic ProphylaxisAnti-Infective AgentsNephrolithotomy, PercutaneousPostoperative ComplicationsTherapeutic IrrigationHumansKidneyAnti-Infective AgentsGentamicinIntrarenal pressurePCNLPovidone-iodineRIRSSepsisUreteroscopy

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.