ArticleArchives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery2026
Evaluation of a novel strap fixation method for biomechanical testing of sheep Achilles tendons.
Article in Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundReliable fixation of tendon specimens is a major challenge in biomechanical testing, as slippage and tissue damage can reduce accuracy and reproducibility. Although various clamp- and suture-based fixation methods have been reported, there is still no widely accepted, practical, low-cost technique that preserves tendon integrity during testing. This study aimed to compare commonly used fixation techniques and to evaluate whether a novel strap-based fixation method provides a more stable and tissue-preserving alternative for biomechanical testing of sheep Achilles tendons.
methodsForty fresh-frozen cadaveric sheep Achilles tendons obtained from a local butcher were used, and the specimens were stored at - 20 °C until testing. After controlled thawing at room temperature, all tendons were repaired using the Bunnell suture technique with No. 0 Vicryl. Four different proximal fixation methods were evaluated: (1) sutured fixation with strap, (2) direct clamp fixation, (3) Kocher clamp fixation, and (4) Krackow suture fixation. All specimens were mounted on a universal testing machine and subjected to a load-to-failure protocol at a constant loading rate of 10 mm/s. Maximum force (N), displacement at failure (mm), and mechanical failure mechanisms were recorded for each sample. Data were analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis test with Bonferroni-corrected Mann-Whitney U tests for pairwise comparisons (p < 0.0083).
resultsThe strap method demonstrated the highest numerical load-carrying capacity [114.58 N (73.59-135.00)] with relatively controlled displacement [16.96 mm (8.79-26.52)]. Its maximum load was significantly higher than that of the direct clamp and Kocher clamp methods; however, the difference compared with the Krackow suture method did not remain statistically significant after Bonferroni correction. Tendons fixed directly by clamp (Group 2) exhibited tissue damage due to clamp pressure and showed lower load capacity [75.41 N (58.28-110.78)] with greater displacement [28.01 mm (17.63-51.93)]. The Kocher clamp method (Group 3) provided the lowest mechanical strength, and most specimens slipped at the onset of loading [38.35 N (26.41-49.53); 15.55 mm (10.92-17.54)]. The Krackow suture method (Group 4) showed intermediate performance [82.95 N (65.62-148.50); 27.00 mm (19.49-30.75)].
conclusionThe strap fixation method provided stable fixation, no visible slippage, and the highest numerical load-to-failure values among the tested techniques. It was significantly stronger than the direct clamp and Kocher clamp methods; however, it was not statistically superior to the Krackow suture method after Bonferroni correction. The strap method may therefore be considered a practical and tissue-preserving alternative for further biomechanical tendon testing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.